This entry was posted on Friday, January 11th, 2008 at 9:57 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Marantz video demonstrating their new PMD620 portable recorder
As listeners to FIR may know (or longtime readers of this blog), I’m a big fan of the Marantz PMD660 and have been using it now for recording interviews in the field for most of 2 years, if not longer.
I’ve tested the PMD 620.
It could be our (radio-station) next fieldrecorder but ….
How on earth dare you put the ‘professional’ label on an audio-device with digital delay in the earphone’s output.
I don’t understand hardware-developers proudly put their roll out in production without it being tested by users. They have to fix this error.
Ron Versteeg, reporter for RTVNH, The Netherlands.
the guys worked hard;
New downloadeble firmware did the trick; So: no more delay in the audio.
I’m decided to continue testing (and using) this fieldrecorder.
interested in results?
January 31, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Marantz video demonstrating their new PMD620 portable recorder
As listeners to FIR may know (or longtime readers of this blog), I’m a big fan of the Marantz PMD660 and have been using it now for recording interviews in the field for most of 2 years, if not longer.
February 13, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I’ve tested the PMD 620.
It could be our (radio-station) next fieldrecorder but ….
How on earth dare you put the ‘professional’ label on an audio-device with digital delay in the earphone’s output.
I don’t understand hardware-developers proudly put their roll out in production without it being tested by users. They have to fix this error.
Ron Versteeg, reporter for RTVNH, The Netherlands.
April 27, 2008 at 9:50 pm
the guys worked hard;
New downloadeble firmware did the trick; So: no more delay in the audio.
I’m decided to continue testing (and using) this fieldrecorder.
interested in results?